Archive for the ‘Relativity’ Category

245 – As Everything in Nature, We are a (body/system[e=mc2]) …

Monday, June 1st, 2020

There is nothing that empirically proves how profoundly interrelated we are with everything in Nature more than a verified scientific theory, and Albert Einstein’s Special Relativity does that for me.

In 1905, in his famous paper “Does The Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content,” Einstein’s great insight into the nature of our Universe came into life: “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.

To comprehend the essence of Einstein’s insight, we must consider:

1 – that mass and energy constitute the fundamental substance of evolving bodies, or systems, in our Universe.

2 – that the contents of the mass and the contents of the energy of a system are interchangeable and fluctuate as the system unfolds.

3 – that although the contents fluctuate, their equivalence remains in relative equilibrium, one content always a measure of the other.

4 – that whether by instinct or self-determination, for a system to sustain the contents of its fundamental substance in relative equilibrium as it changes and develops, it must exercise a degree of self-reflection.

As with every evolving system in Nature, the human body survives through a process in which it consumes energy from the environment, converts it into mass, and then in motion, action, creation, transformation releases the energy back into the environment. But the key to the continuity of this process is to keep it in equilibrium … one content a measure of the other … as we develop and adapt to changing environments. This process, although mostly instinctive, is not possible without a degree of self-reflection.

Without disregarding the mathematical prowess of the equation, the essence of Einstein’s insight rests not on the quantities of energy and mass in a body, but on the fact that self-reflection is innate in Nature. This is the true significance of the equal symbol in the equation.

Whether the body is that of an atom, a cell, a human being, a planetary system, a galaxy, the Universe itself, to be capable of sustaining the contents of its fundamental substance in relative equilibrium amid constant change, it must, whether by instinct or self-determination, reflect upon itself – measuring itself, finding balance within itself. Therefore, the equation is more precise as (body/system[e=mc2]), or simply (S[e=mc2]).

The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.

Our intellect, if we let it, can comprehend the fact that we are embedded in a dimension that renders us infinitesimally small from the perspective of the universal dimensions and infinitely vast from the perspective of the atomic dimensions, that we are all evolving systems made up of evolving systems and parts of evolving systems, that we are all instances of the equation and therefore profoundly interrelated in our innate search for equilibrium.

The theory of Relativity proves how profoundly interrelated everything in Nature is, and we will be more rational and understanding in our relationship with each other and with Nature when we accept this about us.

Revised March 2022  

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month.

184 – The Meaning, the Essence of E=mc2 …

Thursday, November 2nd, 2017

From ancient times, poets, sages, philosophers, scientists, individual human beings, have pondered about the existence of a Higher Being. We try to understand this Being with beliefs, concepts, names, like Nature, God, Creator, Buddha, Allah, Shiva, the Tao, Life, Spirit, Energy, Universe, and so forth. But the truth is that we do not know with certainty what this Being is, how it emerged into existence, into Life. We have theories, hypotheses, assumptions, but we truly do not know. It is a mystery as profound as the mystery of Life itself. Yet discoveries in science show patterns in our Universe that give us insights into the nature of this Being: One of the patterns is manifested in the recurrence of equilibrium at microscopic and macroscopic levels in Nature.

At this point I must assert two facts that are self-evident to me: 1 – the Universe is the body of a living, intelligent, self-creating, organism and 2 – I am one of its myriad components.

But here is the conundrum:

Regardless of the size or level of complexity of a component, ongoing equilibrium between its elements is not possible without a degree of self-reflection – one element a measure of the other as the component unfolds.

But the deeper I peer into the composition and complexity of our Universe, the less I know about the reason for its existence, its capacity to self-create, the magnificence and ruthlessness of its progression. Yet a force propelling its existence beyond the natural boundaries that check its evolution is conspicuous. That force is self-reflection; Life reflecting upon its own unfolding.

My mind grows beyond the limits of my body, and I am set free to try to know what I am, to know why a Force born into me, etched into me, incites me to reach out, to overcome boundaries, to Know. And yet this Force is, must always be, a reflection of my limitations.

Like the Universe, I am the physical organization of trillions of components. Their combined mass turns into the force of a mind able to reflect upon its own emergence, yet this force reflects my limitations.

Self-reflective equilibrium is the essence of e=mc2 – the equivalence between what is, and what may be.

And because I am one of its components, Einstein’s insight into the nature of our Universe let me peek into the nature of something that is, and what it might be.

Revised February 2021   

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the Home page’s left column, down below the Archives.

183 – E=mc2 and Me …

Sunday, October 15th, 2017

I have never been good at mathematics. I didn’t even try when I was in school. Although I can understand the allure of numbers and equations, they always seemed not just beyond me but beyond the capacity to explain what is profoundly important to me: The emergence of conscious self-reflection in Life. Fortunately, I am good at seeing patterns and their logic, and so I was able to survive not only school but my tenure in the financial industry while sifting for meaning in mathematical theories.

My early realization of the fact that I am particularly bad at mathematics brought me to the conclusion that the only way to begin to understand what I am in the scheme of the Universe was by applying what we already know about the physical theories to my own body, to my own life, to my own experience; in other words, making myself an experimental tool.

My interest in Relativity started with Einstein’s ideas and their impact in the way we understand our Universe. The profundity of his insight fascinated me – a mind that, with a simple equation, E=mc2, encapsulated a fundamental property of Nature. And so, without previous education in these matters, I embarked on a quest to try to understand the meaning of the famous equation by applying it to me. Most books on the subject were prominently mathematical, full of charts and equations, but I persisted in finding the meaning of the equation between the lines. And guided mainly by his own description of the equation on the 1905 paper: “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content,” I began to see the light at the end of the tunnel.

The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content. [1] How does this apply to my own body?

I know that my body is made out of atoms at the most basic level and that atoms are fundamentally condensations of mass and reservoirs of energy. Therefore, I am a condensation of mass and a reservoir of energy at the most basic level.

The mass of my body was easy to figure out: It is what has grown out of two cells into a 5.10” tall, 150 lb. organism; it is what I can touch, what I can weigh, what I can measure, what I can play with; it is what breathes and eats and moves and acts, it is what consumes and dissipates; it is what directs me to sit down or walk; it is what hurts and makes me uncomfortable when I am injured or get sick.

The energy was more elusive. What is that portion of me, the measure of which is equivalent to the content of my mass times the speed of Light squared?

I started comprehending what this immense amount of energy is when I realized that what I’ve learned to be immaterial – mind, thought, ingenuity, curiosity, focus, persistence, imagination – is physical energy, the energy that I can perceive and measure. I am not only the energy I metabolize and transform into physical acts like motion and action, I am also the physical energy I generate when I am thinking, imagining, focusing, calculating, learning; the physical energy of decisions with the power to change the course of my life, and decisions that can sometimes change the lives of others; I am the physical energy of a mind endowed with the power to impact my own development and, sometimes, the development of the world in which I exist.

For me, there is no clearer example of the power contained in a human mind as that of Einstein’s encapsulation of a universal property in e=mc2.

[1] Highlight mine

Revised January 2021   

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the Home page’s left column, down below the Archives.

150 – Making Sense of (S[e=mc2]) …

Sunday, May 15th, 2016

It is challenging for the non-scientific, non-mathematical mind to comprehend the concept of Einstein’s E=mc2. In his own words, “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.” But it will be less challenging when instead of the mathematics, the ‘body’, the system, becomes the main focus of the equation.

The distances between the planets, the stars, and the galaxies in our Universe are vast. And so, to have a vague idea of what those distances are, let’s review some of the information we already have. Let us start with the picture below taken by the Cassini Spacecraft in 2013, which shows Earth from Saturn’s rings as a tiny spec of light (click on the image to enlarge it).





To simplify the distances between the Sun and the planets, astronomers use Astronomical Units. An Astronomical Unit, ‘au’ for short, is the average distance from Earth to the Sun at 150 million kilometers (93 million miles). And so, taking ‘au’s as measurement, the distance from Earth to Saturn is ten ‘au’s, and the distance from Earth to the Heliopause is 100 ‘au’s (see the chart below showing Voyager 1 crossing the Heliopause in 2014 after 36 years of travel), and the distance from Earth to the farthest edges of the Oort Cloud, the theoretical boundary of our Solar System, is ~100,000 ‘au’s. Keep in mind that our Sun is an average-sized star in the Milky Way galaxy, where some stars are a hundred times more massive and others just one-tenth of our Sun’s mass.





But because the astronomical distances beyond our Solar System are so much vaster, astronomers use light-years, which is the distance light travels in a year at 299,792 kilometers (186,000 miles) per second. And so, for instance, the distance from the Sun to the farthest edge of the Oort Cloud is 0.3 light-years, and the distance from our Sun to Alpha Centaury, our nearest star, is 4.3 light-years.

Now, if we can imagine putting together 1 – an estimated 200 to 400 billion stars, 2 – keep each star from its nearest neighbors at a distance proportionate to its mass, and 3 – embed all 200/400 billion stars in a sphere estimated to be ~180,000 light-years in diameter, we can then begin to fathom the magnitude of our galaxy, which is just one of an estimated 100 billion galaxies in our Universe.

Now, if we can imagine 1 – keeping each one of the 100 billion galaxies in our Universe separated from each other at a distance proportional to their mass, and 2 – embedding them all in an expanding bubble estimated to be 93 billion light-years in diameter, we can then begin to fathom not only the magnitude of our Universe but the expanses between its galaxies; the expanses we currently believe to be empty space and call “Dark Matter or Dark Energy.”

Now, if we consider 1 – the size of our Solar System, 2 – the fact that the Sun embodies 99.8% of the mass content of the entire system, while the planets, satellites, asteroids, comets, dust, etc., embody the remaining 0.2%, and 3 – that the rest of the Solar System, what we perceive as ‘empty’ space, is the energy content of the System – the pull and push, the centrifugal and centripetal forces, the electromagnetic fields – we can then begin to glimpse at the proportions in Einstein’s equation. The mass content of the Solar System (1.00 solar masses), times the speed of Light (299,792 km/186,000 ml) squared, is the measure of the energy content of the dynamic, self-regulating sphere with an estimated diameter of about 100,000 ‘au’s we call our Solar System (see picture below).







These figures, although subject to constant revisions as technology improves, are very difficult for the lay human mind to conceptualize. And yet they even get more difficult when we look at the other end of the spectrum, at the world of the atomic elements. Think, for instance, that there are an estimated 37.2 trillion cells in a human body, and that in an avarege human cell there are an estimated ~100 trillion atoms, and that each atom is a pocket of energy where to find the energy content we multiply its mass content by the speed of Light squared … think Hiroshima.

These are the proportions that e=mc2 establishes. Without regard to the size or configuration of a system, one content must be a measure of the other. This is the changing constant supporting the unfolding of manifold levels of complexity and order.

But then What or Who establishes these rules? What, Who perpetuates them while changing and being changed? What, Who operates the system in (S[e=mc2])?


[1] The distance of Saturn from Earth is currently 1,509 billion kilometers (0.93 billion miles) equivalent to 10.09 ‘au’s. Light takes 1 hour, 23 minutes and 55.8 seconds to travel from Saturn to Earth.

 Source of Pictures: Internet sites (earth-from-saturn-900Mmiles-cassini.jpg), (Voyager-1-Goes-Interstellar.jpg), (Kuiper-oort.jpg).

Revised November 2020   

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the Home page’s left column, down below the Archives.

148 – (System[e=mc2]) or simply (S[e=mc2]) …

Friday, April 15th, 2016

At the most fundamental level, evolving bodies or systems in our Universe (atoms, cells, human beings, solar systems, galaxies), are a substance of fluctuating yet equivalent mass and energy contents.

An evolving body grows and develops within a supportive environment through a process of assimilation, transformation, and dissipation of energy sources. In this process, energy is converted into mass and mass into energy while their contents remain in equilibrium. This is a primordial process subject to the rigors of the Universal Principle Einstein encompassed in E=mc2, an equation that demands that,  for a body to be functional, it must maintain its mass and energy contents in relative equilibrium. This is explicit in Einstein’s own explanation of his equation “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content”. The role of the ‘body’ is to measure the contents and, in symbiosis with environments, maintain them in equilibrium. And when or if for any reason (environmental devastation, disease, age, catastrophic event), the body is rendered unable to abide by the Principle, it either restructures or perish.

Let me apply the rigors of the Universal Principle to a couple of familiar systems: The human body and the human species.

Engendered upon the union of ovum and sperm, we begin our development through a process of assimilation, transformation, and dissipation of energy sources, which are provided at first by the nutrients of the supportive environment of the womb, and then by the environment at large. From the moment the first two cells merge, and by actively abiding by the demands of the Universal Principle, our body takes over its own survival. It is so that, at every step of our development, from the duplication of the first cells to the actions of a mature, self-reflective being, we keep what we consume in relative equilibrium with what we exert. We must restructure if we fail to do so, or otherwise perish.

Our species has evolved within a supportive environment through a primordial process of assimilation, transformation, and dissipation of energy sources in which energy is converted into mass (population) and mass into energy (growth). Whether it is just a few of us or billions, and whether we do it by instinct or self-determination, we abide by the Universal Principle by collectively maintaining in relative equilibrium what we assimilate from the environment with what we dissipate back into it. If we are unable to sustain this equilibrium, we either restructure or perish altogether.

No evolving system we know of in Nature can exist for long without taking active participation in its own survival.

Therefore, whether the body is that of a molecule, a cell, a tree, a human being, a species, a planet, a galaxy, would it not be more accurate for the equation that quantifies the role of our bodies to be represented, instead of E=mc2, by the more factual (System[e=mc2]), or simply (S[e=mc2])?

*Einstein’s September 1905 paper. Highlight mine.

Revised September 2020   

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the left column of the Home page, down below the Archives.

56 – E=mc2 and us (Part III) …

Friday, June 1st, 2012

Theoretically, we know that atoms are the most basic stuff we are made of, yet we think of them as something alien, something that belongs to another realm, something that has nothing to do with us.

Early in the Twentieth Century, our Solar System was used as an analogy to understand and visualize the structure of atoms. Most of us still cling to this analogy.

The analogy does point to some obvious similarities. As planets in our solar system circle the Sun in relatively stable orbits, so electrons in atoms circle a nucleus in relatively stable orbits; as the combined mass of planets and Sun is miniscule in relation to the entire size of the solar system which extends to the outermost reaches of the Oort Cloud, so the combined mass of the electrons and nucleus is miniscule in relation to the total size of the atom; as the expanses in which planets and sun interact appears to be ‘empty’, so the expanses in which electrons and nucleus interact appears to be ‘empty’.

Where the analogy is completely misleading is in our assumption that the expanses in which the components interact is empty. It is not. It is Energy. But because energy is invisible to us, we cling to that assumption and force it into our understanding of reality.

The universal scope of e=mc2, as explained by Einstein, is that the mass of a body (or system) is a measure of its energy content. [1]

In other words, no matter how big or small, simple or complex a system might be, its mass content (the combined volume of its components) must be equivalent to its energy content. The two contents complement each other as they interact with environments; they are the Fundamental Complements of all physical systems in Nature.

Mass is condensed energy, and energy is liberated mass.” [2] The contents fluctuate as the body develops, but they must remain in relative equilibrium – one always a relative measure of the other – for the body to sustain a continuous form of existence. The body disintegrates once it can no longer sustain equilibrium. This process, so essential to our survival, is mostly instinctive and beyond our awareness; we only become aware when, for instance, we feel the need to eat and rest to replenish the energy spent on a stressful day. The body is re-balancing.

Our bodies evolve by seeking balance; without it, we distort and infringe.

We are out of balance: Our exponential growth and level of consumption are altering the chemical equilibrium of the Earth, and we either readjust or pay the consequences for our infringement.

Yet powerful, dominant forces, ignorant in their greed, want us to continue growing and consuming as if there is no tomorrow.

Will we let them?

[1] Parenthesis mine.

[2] Unknown source

Revised October 2018

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the left column of the Home page, down below the Archives.

18 – Relativity [E=mc2] and us …

Monday, November 1st, 2010

The beauty and significance of Einstein’s e=mc2 have not been generally grasped by the non-mathematical mind, mainly because the explanation of the equation does not give us a frame of reference. Einstein discovered Nature’s innate search for equilibrium, and he quantified it with a body in mind; in his own words: “The mass of a body is a measure of its energy content.” But under our current understanding of the equation we do not know whose, or what kind of body he was talking about.

There is no refuting the facts that 1 – all things in Nature … molecules, cells, bone structure, trees, us, metals, gases, mountains, planets, suns, etc., etc. … whether we can see them or not, are bodies or systems made of congregations of atoms, and 2- that, to continuously exist as a cohesive unit, these bodies or systems must find a way to sustain a relatively constant equilibrium between their energy and mass contents. This is the meaning of the equal symbol in the equation.

Oftentimes consciously, but mostly instinctively, our bodies experience this constant search for equilibrium when, for instance, wethe commanding element, the operator of the system … feel the need/urge to re-plenish spent energy, and so we rest or ingest energy sources. We then transform that energy into motion, or into the generation of new cells, or into the power, and the decisions, that fuel our development.

Thus, the question begs to be asked: Where are WE, the commanding element, the operator of the body/system in e=mc2? Where is the operator that knows how to interchange fundamental forces while keeping them in equilibrium? Where is the commanding element that keeps each content a measure of the other? Wouldn’t it then be more realistic to express the equation as (System [e=mc2]), so what monitors the fundamental forces and knows how to keep them in balance is included?

To understand the essence of a natural system, whether it is an atom, a cell, a human being, a planetary system, a universe, we must include the commanding element that binds and directs them, whether instinctively or self-determinedly, into continuous yet supple stages of relative equilibrium.

But although having a frame of reference will help us get a better sense of the significance of the equation, the greatest obstacle to a worldwide acceptance is our unfounded fear to integrate into our minds the irrefutable fact that there is immense power within us to master the two fundamental complements, but with the irrevocable condition that we keep them in equilibrium.

It is therefore disturbing to realize that instead of giving us moral direction to find the knowledge of the power contained within us, current scientific ideology consents without an outcry to use knowledge of this power to do something as horrible as the sparing of the city of Hiroshima from conventional bombing so it could serve as a pristine target for a monstrous experiment, or to do something as vile as the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent people for no other reason than to satisfy the utter arrogance and greed of a head of state, or to do something as harmful as the condoning of contraceptives by a religious leader knowing full well the destructive impact of over-population  that has thrown us out of equilibrium with our planet,

For hundreds of years science has been a fountain of sanity, but it has allowed its moral authority to be compromised by losing its soul to weaponry and bigotry, and thus it now stands silenced to decry torture and the imposition of ignorance and irrationality by world leaders lacking a vision for Humanity other than ‘progress’ through the destruction of the world that gives us life.

The power of Einstein’s visionary insight is apparent in the amazing capacity of our solar system to sustain a favorable equilibrium for eons of time so our planet can bring conscious self-awareness into life, or in the beautiful attempt of a baby to stand alone trying to find the internal equilibrium that empowers unimaginable possibilities. Yet knowledge about this is overruled by greed, irrationality, and intolerance.

Revised July 2017

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the left column of the Home page, down below the Archives.

15 – Relativity, Reductionism, and the limits of Science …

Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Reductionism: Derogatory often, any theory or method that holds that a complex idea, system, etc., can be completely understood in terms of its simpler parts or components (World English Dictionary).

Currently dominated by Reductionism, Science, especially the natural sciences, has led us to believe that everything can be understood by isolating its minutest component. This is the main reason why our efforts are focused on finding the particle that will explain it all. This is the main reason why we are today totally mystified by the fact that we can only account for ~10 percent of the composition of our Universe; the rest, ~90 percent, is a mystery to us, and in our bafflement, we call it “dark matter”.

Just imagine our quandary, as advanced and intelligent as we think we are, most of our Universe is a mystery to us.

It is obvious that the focus of Science on Reductionism is narrowing our worldview; there is therefore a need for a more encompassing methodology, one that takes into account the incontrovertible facts that 1 –  everything in our Universe (molecules, human beings, planets, solar systems, galaxies, the Universe itself) is a natural system* of cohesive congregations of atoms, 2 – that at the most fundamental level, atoms are equivalent measures of small concentrations of mass and enormous quantities of energy in fluctuating states of self-reflective equilibrium and 3 – that to begin to comprehend a natural system in our Universe, we have to focus not only on its minutest components, but also on the fact that, at the most fundamental level, every natural system (our Universe included) is mass and of energy in fluctuating states of self-reflective equilibrium.

These facts, although incontrovertible, are novel to most of us even though, as most natural systems do, we experience them when we replenish energy spent in action and motion with rest and nourishment, thus keeping our bodies in relative states of continuous equilibrium.

Dominated by the limits of Reductionism, Science has not yet grasped the essence of Einstein’s magnificent insight, yet, in its simplicity, e=mc2 unequivocally proves that no matter how big, small, simple or complex a natural system might be, they attain relative levels of cohesion and permanence by sustaining their energy and mass contents a measure of each other.

Acknowledging the undeniable fact that we are natural systems will allow us to perceive ourselves, at the most fundamental level, as cohesive bonds of energy and mass that consume and release energy sources from and into the environment to empower the continuity of our bodies with instinctive and premeditated motion and purpose.

When ovum and sperm bond to create a human being, enormous amounts of energy are instinctively gathered and consumed to construct the developing structure of our bodies. Once the structure has reached a plateau, energy can begin to be potentially manipulated with determinations other than physical development … learning mathematics, critical thinking … but this higher capacity must be a measure of the evolving physical potential of the body. It is a law of Nature, as immutable as the law that everything that has a beginning must have an end.

And so, this is what we fundamentally are: The dimension of our organic structure … cells, skeletal system, etc. … is our mass; the dimension of force, motion, action, insight … the reach of our minds, the strength of our passions, the power to create a cohesive structure, the ingenuity to go to the moon … is our energy. But Nature demands of us … as of all natural systems … that to attain a temporary form of existence, the mass of our bodies must learn to constantly reflect upon the extent of our energy, and vice versa, so we can sustain uninterrupted states of self-reflective equilibrium. Because once self-reflective equilibrium is no longer feasible, we disintegrate back into the environment where we came from.

Although the generative power of energy is an obvious fact of Life, the limits of Science inhibit us to see ourselves as generators of energy, but whether we acknowledge it or not, this is what we are. We hold within ourselves immense reservoirs of power, and at times we do feel and use this power. I think most of us can relate to times in our lives when we focused our energy – beam-like – into achieving or possessing something or someone. In times as those our fundamental complements, energy and mass, were self-reflecting, premeditatedly, towards the goal.

Imagine our quandary; under the obstinacy with Reductionism of our current scientific methodology; we are more and more aware of the physical composition of our bodies, but almost in total ignorance about our essential and powerful complement. No wonder why we miss so much!

*When I refer to a ‘natural’ system, I refer to open systems, which come into existence through primal evolutionary processes and interact freely with environments; as opposed to closed systems, which are generally man-made to fit specific expectations.

Revised 11/23/16

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the left column of the Home page, down below the Archives.

13 – Relativity = Self-reflection (Part I)

Saturday, August 14th, 2010

Relativity, along with Evolution, is one of our most popular scientific theories. But as Evolution has been reviled for telling the truth and has been misconstrued by being turned into the destructive concept of ‘Might makes Right”, so the theory of Relativity has been constricted almost exclusively to the realm of mathematics and has been restricted by the limits of the speed of Light. And although Relativity does have something to do with the speed of Light and the prowess of its mathematics, its true essence rests not on those, but on the self-reflective equilibrium between the energy and mass of natural systems.

In 1905 Einstein postulated that “the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content”, and with E=mc2 he quantified that measure: Energy equals the mass content of a body times the speed of Light squared.

Natural systems are always changing under the demands of their internal and external environments; energy is transformed into mass and mass is liberated into energy, but the contents remain in relative equilibrium (greater mass = greater energy, less mass = less energy).

Our organic senses are not sophisticated enough to perceive the dimensions of the atomic elements we are made of, nor the planetary or galactic dimensions in which we are embedded. But we do perceive, albeit mostly instinctively, the need for constant equilibrium between the energy and the mass contents of our bodies; and so, amid change, we keep them in constant equilibrium by increasing or decreasing their contents in equal measure. This is how we grow out of the union of an ovum and a sperm into complex and cohesive organisms. This is why we crave for sustenance and rest when we need to replenish the energy spent in action and motion. This is why we feel depleted and perplexed after the physical exertion of a sexual climax. This is how we exercise power; this is how we are subdued by it.

As described in Post 6, and as quantified by e=mc2, we know for a fact that atomic particles are fundamentally made of immense amounts of energy and minute concentrations of mass. And since our bodies are a congregation of myriad atomic particles, it follows that we are powerhouses of energy.

This is undeniably demonstrated by the reach of the energy generated by a Galilei, or an Einstein, or a Gandhi, or even a Hitler. But dominant doctrines do not allow us to know the power contained within us … it is colossal … and it terrifies them … and it frightens us.

Once again, the visionary words of Marianne Williamson come to mind: “Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure”. (Highlight mine)

Revised 11/16/16

Note: New posts are usually published on the 1st and 15th of the month. To subscribe to the Blog, click on the RSS feeder (orange icon) on the left column of the Home page, down below the Archives.